Censing TO Santistas
July 23, 2010 by Ricardo Melo Bridges
Posted in A (s) Category (s) News , Editorial , Sao Paulo Forum , General
Censing TO Santistas
By Ricardo Melo Bridges
Some of my colleagues Uribe control have come to preach in the market places, like fishwives worthy of the internet, I am nothing short of a traitor because he disagreed with some of the actions and strange movements of Juan Manuel Santos dark days we announce to the country.
Before Uribe, I should clarify with all forcefulness, I am a patriot cabal. I love my country and never occurred to me that personal loyalties must overcome that I owe to Colombia. Being patriotic is not the same as having a vocation to be a merchant or patronage, let alone walk with the knee is placed and petroleum jelly in his pocket, the order of the shift manager, one drop their panties, untársela and say, "Please pattern. "
Juan Manuel Santos and narcoguerrillero amnesty, Gustavo Petro
As Uribe, I never agreed with management that gave health or appointments such as Valencia Cossio, Iguarán and some others in the military leadership and police have made a profound damage to the country.
Censing Santistas acolytes (and some Uribe) have not been able to understand the difference between being patriotic and being lamesiesos of leaders. And they are absolutely different things, my fans friends.
Being patriotic, I repeat, is a vocation of the soul which is above the warlordism, is for the welfare of the Colombian people, not the enrichment of the ministers and congressmen, whose greatest merit is to have had the money to buy 30 or 40mil votes allowed them to sit in his seat to steal public property or make deals with anyone to achieve so secret "here all steal and no one reports to anyone .." being patriotic is to be aware that Colombia is our only home and we can not allow a gang of rogues are stealing it under our noses.
So, being patriotic does not necessarily mean to be Santos. I am amazed that wildly applauded Santistas thurifers photo Petro JM Santos, the great killer of Colombia. It seemed a bold move and advanced call the president-elect to join the government in this great gangster whose greatest achievement was planned from the prison murder of judges and the burning of records in the courthouse, in addition to orchestrating from the legal persecution against the dark army. God forbid that Juan Manuel Santos, bound by his close friendship with Fidel Castro many years, whose family owns Island Weather was vacationing, take us to the XXI century socialism from the hand of the Cuban Venezuelan godson. A Petro, Santos Chavez and unites his friendship with Fidel Castro.
Juan Manuel Santos Castro is joined by an old friend
Another maneuver that seemed worthy of a statesman, when Santos was asked to judge Baltasar Garzon to come to Colombia to hire as a consultant on issues of justice and human rights. Baltasar Garzon, who is famous for prosecuting high-ranking military falsely accusing them of crimes against humanity. Censing Santistas ignore these little favor that it asked Santos Rodriguez Zapatero's Socialist government wants to avoid jail for malfeasance Baltasar Garzon, a crime that our fans are judges and prosecutors. Baltasar Garzon left
Maria Remedios Garcia Albert
free in Spain Maria Remedios Garcia, a partner of the FARC, Baltasar Garzon hates our military and Alvaro Uribe, Baltasar Garzon, on a visit to Colombia, he saw and heard speeches cast against Uribe and the FARC for before a audience of Indians, also helping the guerrillas. If Santos brings Baltasar, with diplomatic immunity, saves him from prison and shields against the extradition request would make the Spanish court, in addition, throw herself into his pocket to NGOs on Human Rights would be a gesture of goodwill the appointment of the judge and inquisitor of our Armed Forces.
Juan Manuel Santos and Baltasar Garzon
For the censing Santistas also seemed like a chess move for the appointment of Juan Camilo Restrepo in the portfolio of Agriculture, Restrepo, for those who do not remember, was a presidential candidate endorsed by the FARC, was in the making Caguan favors the guerrillas and serving as a translator between them and international commissions that came into the service of powerful financial empire of NarcoFarc.
And not to mention the Chancellor Holguin, Mesa-Samper's private secretary, Carrillo-Minister of Justice Gaviria, Pablo Escobar-procuress, Santamaria, who hates parafiscal-they are what holds the SENA and the ICBF- .
To make matters worse, censing Santistas applaud as trained seals that JM Santos, a clear betrayal of the 9 million people who voted against socialism, leave to declare, after having obtained the victory, that he did not march to the beat of Uribe but to walk the Third Way, a completely socialist system of government that, though he perfume cologne "Blair" will not go away musk to FARC.
Being patriotic is not applaud the presidents, vice presidents and congressmen who are periqueros, although coca is "made in Colombia," and at the same time preach combat drug trafficking.
Nor does being a patriot means to reach the Senate by a movement Uribe, hiding being a homosexual, pro-choice and hardened drug addict, and get the votes to be elected president of Congress. If gays want to get to Congress legitimately, why not openly declare their status and seek democratically votes to support their dreams of turning Colombia into the global tourist destination sexual fags ..? If addicts want Congress to come from there, legalizing drugs, why not acknowledge what they want ... why do we deceive those who are against it ..?
To be patriotic is to vote for the party of the FARC to occupy the bodies of the Congress, in exchange for silence in the distribution of contracts ...?
To be patriotic is to provide our soldiers in the clutches of justice politicized, corrupt and crucify narcomamerta while for prosecutors, judges, magistrates and members of Congress cast lots for his clothes ...?
Juan Manuel Santos and Armando Benedetti, current president of the Senate
The spectacle we witnessed on 20 July in Congress, looked more like a coven of drug addicts, criminals, homosexuals and proguerrilleros compadres who premiered their best clothes to celebrate the new four-year robbery and injustice, that what should have been: the establishment an honorable Parliament that is committed to strengthening our nation as a prosperous, equitable and with the dignity that only comes from having well-established values and principles.
It must be said that there are also cases of decency extrañísimos in this Congress. But their voices are not heard because the corrupt majority. On the sides of the ministries have some successes, of course I do, as Dr. shot, and we expect to see in government Rodrigo Rivera, Emel Red ...
What will the censing Santistas calling me a traitor ...? Never mind ....!
Those who call me traitor, I replied that I never betrayed anyone or anything. If you vote for Santos, was with the deep conviction that he would follow the path of zero tolerance Uribe narco-terrorism. But so far, what we saw was the betrayal of Saints who tramples our dignity as a nation joining Petro ties and inviting Chavez to his possession, knowing that this tyrant is funding the FARC and hides them in his territory. It's like if I invite a rapist to a child piñata violated.
My patriotism exceeds bureaucratic tamales and suckling pig. It is better to be proud of the independence of judgment, which partake of the spoils of the bandits, though this position does not produce puesticos, awards or pats on the back.
Santistas, ábranle step to your boss with incense and rugs, and prepare for the nose ring and shackles that this will last four years. Meanwhile I, unless Santos rectify his way to the Third Way, I will lay quietly on this side of the right, waiting for Uribe to return to the presidency.
Is that my patriotism, estimated Santistas censing, leaves me no time to do or be anything else.
July 23, 2010.
Bueno. I already go through that stage, totally agree that is the dilemma at the moment, but my lines depues to write about it, I decided to wait for me next to the first movements of saints after the August 7, to see if it starts act more "Uribistamente" (what a pity the word
. My line is we ended up in yellow light, waiting.
Good article.
Thanks, man ... And yes ... we are in light yellow
Best regards to both, I think not, Vargas or Mockus (Mockus think Uribe would have been more than Santos), I advirtimos the treacherous tendency Santos, and he is not interested in the views of the town after having already achieved what he sought for over 15 years, the presidency.
It hurts to deceive Colombia that way, I have a small exception to be warned of this scam before the vote.
Good bye, they are well and hopefully you can demand your candidate / president for what was then elected to have if left to circumvent the politicians of Colombia.
We note, sorry.
I share your appreciation Ricardo, few journalists tell the truth as it is with an analysis based on facts not assumptions or expectations. Attacks by Santistas are really expressions of the view that it deshaogo chosen turned out to be a gangster. Ellon not think, no reason, just follow like sheep who say Uribe, regardless of whether their decisions are stateless. Few of us fills us with a loyal snetimiento the country, thank God we are part of that amorphous mass-santismo urbismo-Leninism-gavirismo-pastranismo-samperismo. Fellow forward!
Alberto .. first is the country that the icons ... And of course we keep going ..
(A copy of my reply on facebook)
Ricardo:
In advance I apologize for the extension. His writing is hard but necessary ... Just yesterday I said, "God grant that we have not wrong," largely because I share their concerns. I think the extreme complexity of this process of presidential succession Uribe led many (including myself included) we became Santistas censing effectively.
When the CC pit cut our aspiration reelection were before a complicated scenario, we ran the risk of atomizarnos amid streams Arias Vargas Lleras and Santos, which meant putting the country on a silver platter to the wonders of Pastrana and Gaviria . With the first two out of the picture, Santos was a bastion of Uribe and his mission was to face a Brown with 4% of the vote and a Naomi is blurred every day ... until then we were calm and thoughtful as we played with the advantage of the inheritance of the best president in history versus the legacy of two of the less competent.
But the turning point was given to the union Mockus-Fajardo that catapulted the Green Party and managed to get in the surveys as potential losers ... there we became FUNDAMENTAL ... but at that time was necessary because it was holy ... or debacle.
Shadow of doubt, any concerns and prevention former minister automatically disappear from our minds and become censing, will transfer 100% of the trust and unconditional support before we reserved for President Uribe ... and thanks to this win! ! Despite the victory, the effects of fundamentalism that forced yet many people do not stop and I think this explains why call him traitor, disloyal or similar appellations ... is that just a month ago larguito thought we could lose what has been achieved in 8 years how to defend Santos was to defend at all costs ... even if we were not in agreement with him (eg if Angelino).
Now, without the heat of battle, without Petros, luchos, Pastranas or Gavirias in the landscape of power, we must recapture the serenity, the capacity for reflection and critical thinking, we drop the censer and be stewards of the precepts Uribe. For that we need calls for reflection as you do. I have discrepancies in some parts of the article, I consider it too hard at certain points ... but at least I needed it.
A greeting.
Thoughtful conclusions, Luis compatirlas ... Thanks for all of us.
Luis, completely agree, the massive vote for Dr. Santos was not so much on merit, were circumstances that led us to unite in his famous leap for avoiding vacuum that appeared as if we should walk to the edge. We hope that Dr. Santos is smart enough to understand reality, not the passing of naive or worse to try to lead us into socialism backward, or to govern the people we emmpujen cliff.
Although it pains me, I agree on almost everything said in the article; modestly Santos campaign did thinking it was the right thing for the Colombians, and chosen, several acts fill me with doubt, hopefully it will not betray the will of the majority; our criticisms would be difficult to quiet. He believed that this new Congress would be different, which would have the courage to confront the enemies of the state, to appoint a commission of courageous and appropriate charges, but appointments to boards haunts me the frustration and uncertainty: How is may have appointed them to Navas Talero Pole?, a character on the left fan only found defects in the government of Uribe, Benedetti ¿grounds that guarantee minorities?, please if the majority were those who chose that congress , which ceases to be candid, in Latin America are at war against Sao Paulo Forum, against the left and manipulative liar who deceives with the tale of the power to manipulate the people seeking the benefit of the elect and his henchmen, a concerned Congress particular benefits, looks like vultures tearing his prey and is no guarantee: For lack of information I have believed that Uribe's children have been enriched by taking advantage of the father, I hope someday know the truth.
This is the big problem right in the world that when someone does something that is against their "principles" immediately wants to round up and disappear, have always been against minorities, that in a world as in the we live are the ones that we have to support. They just want to see this world full of rich people, white and without any sexual orientation that emerges from the "social norms" it is impossible to see the world changes and we must go with him. Right historically has always gone hand in hand with the worst crimes that have beaten this world, always ampardos by the church. If Santos decides to take other decisions that the right dicrepan What's wrong with this? While no one else gets hurt the people who leave care with a photo or with whom a bond. Why must continue with the dictatorship of Uribe? and on the other side is worse To have on shoulders 2000 murder of boys or meet with a homosexual? Because it seems that the right is worse for a meeting with a gay man who never hurt anyone that a suspected murderer.
The truth is that Santos descrestado me already broken all my expectations, I see that not being a puppet of the system and that's good.
Heterosexuality is not a "social norm", is a rule of nature. Homosexuality, like sex with animals it is a deviation from that standard. Being heterosexual is not to be right .. Note that right people are or were queers and lesbians, as César Gaviria, his wife, Pastrana, Gina Parodi, some military, police, congressmen, presidents of Congress, priests, bishops and cardinals. It is also wrong when you say that the Church supports the right. The church supports who serve him well .. therefore supported the ELN, the FARC, supports priests allied with the guerrillas, supports murderers, guerrilla priests, pedophiles, to drug traffickers, etc..
What of open spaces left on a betrayal of those who voted did not tend to bond with the killer left at Petro represented or Chavez.
As for Santos descrestó ... No doubt ... That's the problem .. to the commies are realizing that Santos seems closer to them than to those we support Uribe
We agree that sex with animals is evil why? Why is hurt another living being who is helpless and can not oppose this brutal act. You can not compare homosexuality with bestiality, the first NO ONE HURTS ANYONE is a desicion completely free, so keep that mere prejudice see how sexuality is a "social norm". On the other hand I knew that a political tendency became someone "mamerto".
I think if we allowed ourselves a false morality and us together to improve things, but not violently as getting used to people, because, put two sides against is very easy, the grandiose is difficult and unite for a common good . But "marriage" and "dialogue" is too big for many people.
True, in part ... homosexuality is not harmful to others, provided that not involving such third parties. Although homosexuality do not agree, I agree that this is a matter of individual freedom between two people. But when those freedoms beyond the bed of homosexuals, and transcend the moral life of the country, that's when the trouble starts. A gay carnival, paid taxes of those we disagree with the homosexual lifestyle advertising designed to attract the attention of children, it is incorrect in any way. A name so homosexuality hidden from his chips in Congress, by passing as heterosexuals, but to legislate in favor of gay, abhorrent things approving the adoption by homosexuals is not correct. I know several gay people who live a public life without pretending that all we become gay or that Congress should prioritize these hobbies sex. Sexual preferences should be very personal thing. Make them a matter of State is disproportionate and unfair. If homosexuals want to launch the congress, the presidency or whatever, do so ...! but do not hide under the appearance of a morality that do not share. Now that's immoral.
No two sides. I am not against homosexuals do not pretend to be shot .. but I demand that they respect our children, our families and our beliefs. I do not share the dictatorship of minorities.
Every time you ring, and I say with respect, more and more like Mussolini and Franco. Would not surprise me to hear soon calling for "good people" to arms.
Marcela .. Never heard Mussolini or Franco .. But not wrong, good people must defend the state with weapons. If there is aggression by Hugo Chavez, the response must be armed ...
It gives me chills you.
That's what causes me Chavez ...
Give me the chills, hunger, social inequality, the justification for any form of violence. Gives me chills to talk about national values, but not considered including the right to life, freedom of thought and free expression. Chávez no es el principal problema de Colombia: el problema de nuestro país somos nosotros mismos, nuestro desprecio por la vida humana y los demás derechos humanos, nuestra actitud acrítica y nuestra poca memoria. Me produce escalofríos que nos considere usted tan brutos como para pensar que el Chavismo tiene alguna opción en Colombia, o que del otro lado de la frontera van a ser tan estùpidos como para lanzarnos un ataque. Lo invito sinceramente a reflexionar.
Marcela.. quién le ha dicho que valores patrios no es el derecho a la vida…??? Precisamente por eso es que debemos acabar con los asesinos de las FARC…! Otra cosa son aquellos izquierdistas que ni apoyan ni aplauden a las FARC. El problema de Colombia son las FARC.. y Chávez las está financiando y escondiendo. Una vez solucionado esto, sí podremos hablar de empezar a sentar las bases de la equidad social.. En medio del horror de las NARCOFARC no podemos hablar de nada más que de eso. Si usted no cree que el chavismo tiene opción en Colombia, dése una vuelta por las sedes del Polo, vaya a Barranquilla, yaya a manifestaciones públicas y desfiles de indígenas, corteros o sindicalistas…vaya a mitines del Polo y se dará cuenta de qué tan cerca estamos de esa pesadilla..
Nunca dejo de reflexionar
Es que ud. lo acaba de decir. Para “defender” el derecho a la vida de unos, promueve usted la muerte de otros. Es el mismo discurso anacrónico y estùpido de la guerrilla y del paramilitarismo. Por “defender” el derecho a la vida, parece ud. estar de acuerdo en una salida violenta al conflicto con Venezuela. Por otra parte, si el problema de la equidad social se solucionara solamente cuando se acabe la guerrilla, cómo es que otros países del mal llamado tercer mundo que no tienen un conflicto interno como el nuestro tampoco han logrado acabar con el hambre y la pobreza? El Polo sacó escasos 1'600.000 votos, y le debo recordar que la CGT es de la coalición del gobierno ahora. Me va ud. a decir que el Chavismo tiene opción contra 9 millones de votos que en gran medida se dieron como reacción misma al Chavismo?
El derecho a nuestra vida se defiende, incluso y si es necesario, con la muerte de quien quiere asesinarnos… En cuanto al problema del hambre en latinoamérica, es algo extenso para explicárselo aquí, pero la guerrilla ciertamente lo agrava. En cuanto a que Chávez no tiene opción, le recuerdo que para eso la izquierda se inventó aquello de “combinación de todas formas de lucha”, que significa ni más ni menos que ellos saben que por la fuerza no podrán jamás conquistar este país. Por ello es que combinan la guerra jurírica, el accionar político legal, camuflado del Polo y el PV, militares infiltrados, etc. Los 9 millones de votos no tendríamos opción si se siguen nombrando en el poder a chavistas camuflados
With this argument advocates the extermination of people who do not share the ideals of the current government. It takes more than make the argument that these people threaten the sovereignty to act on the pretext of preventive action. The hunger problem is not unique to Latin America, and I do not think you understand it enough to explain. No doubt the guerrilla problem is an important factor in the Colombian case, but I think far to much to be the main cause. I also remind you that what you euphemistically call "legal war" is based on the fundamental right of all human beings to justice, and who demand justice suggest that the State is supporting the guerrillas not only libelous but violates the right to free thought, in a way not dissimilar to what happens in Venezuela. In his Manichean view and prejudiced even Juan Manuel Santos was being Chavista and several presidents. One of these will start pc. to doubt even A. Uribe, and I fear also that one morning while looking in the mirror will start to doubt yourself. May I respectfully suggest it: perhaps you are looking for the enemy of the country in the wrong place.
Do not be extreme .. There are no extermination of people who think differently than the government. There are still alive Petro and other amnestied guerrillas ... and about my doubts, do not think I have not thought .. but so much in doubt, keep silent .. a greeting
In Colombia, someone dies every day killed for the same reasons that pc. wields. Do not ask me that is not extremist, when your thinking is similar to that of murderers like Carlos Castano. I remember the extermination of the UP? Or the murder of Carlos Pizarro? "There is no extermination of people who think differently than the government" ... I honestly do not believe him. I do read the news daily. A greeting.
The UP was wiped out by the FARC, drug trafficking and in some cases by government agents at the time. As I think like Carlos Castano, I will skip the insult ... Good day
http://www.semana.com/noticias-nacion/asesinan-dirigente-indigena-del-polo-luis-socarras/142315.aspx
JAJAJAJAJAJA This gives me great shame. Happy wrote several days of life by "the beating by the Colombians at the polls to the claims-Cuban Chavez in Colombia" to which he described as "monumental."
Now comes out with gems like "JM Santos, a clear betrayal of the 9 million people who voted against socialism, leave to declare, after having obtained the victory, that he did not march to the beat of Uribe but walk the Third way, a completely socialist system of government "..." God forbid that Juan Manuel Santos, bound by his close friendship with Fidel Castro many years, whose family owns Island Weather was vacationing, take us to socialism century by the hand of the Cuban Venezuelan godson. A Petro, Santos Chavez and unites his friendship with Fidel Castro "
Now say that the blame for their inconsistencies and mischief he writes is of homosexuals, the "far" from the Supreme Court of Chavez, Fidel, Mockus, or rain, or cold, or phases of the moon or the octopus paul? Maybe soon my fault ....
"Dotor dum" is consistent with my country, not leaders. Similarly, if Alvaro Uribe had betrayed Colombia, here we had reported. The inconsistency is to keep stubbornly defending the indefensible and denying that we were deceived. Santos himself said: "It's stupid not to change his mind when circumstances change .."
Secondly, the beating given to the left itself was monumental .. 9 million Colombians dijero "NO" to the international mamertada
This article suggests that President Santos is well on the razon.Este camino.el man of the extreme right feel panic because lost its icon, it is good know that Colombia has a president for all Colombians.
This man looked in the mirror today and said to yourself I think you're betraying me and I will pay off! Confiezo that this form of dementia desconocida.pero I was "nothing human is alien to me" and in the country Paranoia is bigger than one that fills with indignation cree.Lo is that justice disqualify this guy grew up reading the manuals safe execution of the phalanx Franco.
CONFESS. I also agree with you Richard, in the few moves he has made Santos, I am disappointed. But wait anxiously for the return of Alvaro Uribe to the presidency. Those who voted for Santos, did not by him but by Uribe.